Stengel v. United States involved the search for a person in which location?

• A. Public street
• B. Third-party home
• C. Police station
• D. Public park

Answer: (B)

When police are trying to locate a person believed to be in someone else’s home, they must respect privacy in private residences and cannot rely on an arrest warrant alone to enter the third party’s dwelling. The rule, established in Steagald v. United States, is that a warrant to arrest a fugitive does not authorize entry into a third party’s home to seize that person; a separate search warrant or equivalent authorization is typically required to search the residence for the individual. This distinction protects the homeowner’s privacy and sets a clear threshold for when the police can intrude into private living space.

Public places like streets or parks and even a police station involve different expectations of privacy, and generally do not raise the same need for entering another person’s private residence. The location in a third-party home is the scenario that triggers the specific protective requirement.